Legal Opinion

Lavin v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1975No. L.A. 30378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinaiy Board of the State Bar (board) that petitioner Thomas A. Lavin be suspended from the practice of law for three months and until he makes restitution.

Petitioner was admitted to practice law in 1967, practicing continually until July 1972. He resumed active practice in November 1974 in Laguna Beach.

The local administrative committee unanimously found petitioner culpable in four matters, recommending his suspension for two years and until he makes specified restitution to his clients.

The board unanimously found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ridley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Alkow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Schullman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hyland v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMorris v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Farnham v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bate v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API