Schullman v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Alexander H. Schullman, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
— Alexander H. Schullman petitions for review after the State Bar Disciplinary Board found him guilty of professional misconduct 1 and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for two years.
This proceeding concerns three separate instances of misconduct. Petitioner is charged with failing to perform legal services after accepting a $100 retainer to handle a case for the Regis H. Millers of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (hereinafter referred to as the Miller matter), with failing to take any legal action after being paid $500 by Maurice Stein to reopen a lawsuit…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Keyes v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Bluestein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re StrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.