Legal Opinion
Farnham v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1976No. L.A. 30538PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for two years upon conditions of probation, including actual suspension for six months.
Petitioner was admitted to practice law in California in 1961. He was previously disciplined here for nonpayment of dues 1 and for abandonment of clients’ interests. 2 In the current proceeding, petitioner was charged with violation of his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6103, 6067, 6068), the unauthorized…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Crawford v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re Ronald T. Mitchell, Esq. In Re Stafford A. Hilaire, EsqCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Fitzpatrick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In THE MATTER OF McINERNEYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.