Legal Opinion

State v. Eakins

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 2006No. A05-1453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant Jonathan David Eakins was cited for owning a motor vehicle that failed to stop at the warning lights and stop-signal arm of a school bus. On appeal, he argues that the statute is unconstitutional because it violates the owner’s right to due process by creating an irrebuttable presumption or an irrational rebuttable presumption that the owner of the car was the driver, or by criminalizing car ownership generally. He also argues that his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were violated during the evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

FACTS

At about 3:50 p.m. on October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. DeMars v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. TotimehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API