Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Keith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1979No. Nos. 10423, 10431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Presiding Judge.

These appeals arise out of a single transaction — the sale of a business called the Urbana Sales Barn, and the land on which the business is located. The sale was consummated by the execution of two contracts, one written, the other oral. The written contract is a contract for a deed to a one-half interest in a tract of land on which the business is located. The oral contract covered the sale of the “business,” 1 plaintiff Carl Arnett’s interest in the equipment used in the business, the “goodwill” of the business, and possibly a restaurant.

Plaintiffs declared first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. In Re the Trust Under the Last Will & Testament of JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. JR Watkins Company v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Harms v. SimkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Savings Finance Corporation v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Star Development Corporation v. Urgent Care Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Warstler v. CibrianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Burst v. RW Beal & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Moore v. DahlbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API