Legal Opinion

Burst v. RW Beal & Co., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1989No. 55011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Plaintiffs, buyers, sued defendant, building contractor/seller, to recover $5,000. After a jury waived trial, the court entered judgment of $8,288 in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals. We reverse and remand with directions.

The trial court entered its judgment along with its findings, the latter being designated “Findings of Fact.” On appeal, defendant contends the actual “findings” made by the trial court do not support conclusions of law which would result in the judgment of $3,288 entered in favor of plaintiffs; rather, defendant contends these “findings” lead to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Highland Inns Corp. v. American Landmark Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Grand Bissell Towers, Inc. v. Joan Gagnon Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Goldberg v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. The Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Bishop v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monsanto Company v. Homan McFarlingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Paragon Group, Inc. v. AmplemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gilmartin Bros., Inc. v. KernMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Anthony Arcese v. Daniel Schmitt & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Star Development Corporation v. Urgent Care Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API