Legal Opinion

Hoverson v. Hoverson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20140198PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Sandra Hoverson appeals from an amended divorce judgment denying her motion to modify spousal support and parenting time, granting Carl Hoverson’s motion to modify parenting time and to appoint a parenting coordinator, and granting Carl Hoverson’s request for attorney fees. We affirm the amended judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In 2012, Carl and Sandra Hover-son were divorced in a judgment awarding Sandra Hoverson about $2.8 million and Carl Hoverson about $11.6 million in marital property and awarding her spousal support of $3,000 per month for two years, child support of $3,002 per…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Reinecke v. GriffethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Schurmann v. SchurmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Votava v. VotavaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Capes v. CapesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API