Legal Opinion

Kostelecky v. Kostelecky

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2006No. 20050231PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Pamela Jane Kostelecky, now known as Pamela Barrett (“Barrett”), appeals, and Kim Wayne Kostelecky (“Kos-telecky”) cross-appeals from a district court judgment distributing their marital property and awarding spousal support to Barrett. We affirm the district court’s valuation of the parties’ marital property; however, because we conclude the district court failed to adequately explain its award of spousal support and distribution of marital property, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Barrett and Kostelecky were married on November 19, 1997, and had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weir v. WeirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sack v. SackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lorenz v. LorenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API