Legal Opinion

Votava v. Votava

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2015No. 20140460PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrew Votava appeals from a district court order denying his request to hold Kelly Votava in contempt and modifying his parenting time. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to find Kelly Votava in contempt, but we conclude the court erred in modifying Andrew Votava’s parenting time without a motion or notice. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

[¶ 2] Andrew and Kelly Votava were divorced in 2009. Kelly Votava was awarded primary residential responsibility for the parties’ two minor children, and Andrew Votava received reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Loll v. LollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. CurtissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Booen v. AppelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Curtiss v. CurtissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API