Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Bank of Blue Valley

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 20, 2010No. Case CV F 10-1740 LJO SKOPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ F.R.Civ.P. 12 MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 8.)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) seek to dismiss as legally and túne barred plaintiffs Edward Hamilton (“Mr. Hamilton”) and Anne Marie Hamilton’s (“Mrs. Hamilton’s”) claims arising from foreclosure of their Oakhurst, California residence (“property”). Mr. and Mrs. Hamilton appear to chiefly oppose dismissal in that Chase and MERS (collectively “defendants”) did not respond to Mr. and Mrs. Hamilton’s request for documents…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Monreal v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
  2. Lester v. J.P. Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  3. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems v. RobinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. (PC) Aguilar-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (PC) Crain v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API