Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems v. Robinson
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order DENYING Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.
Before the Court is'Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Dkt. # 34. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court DENIES the motion.
I. Background
In February 2005, Defendants Daniel and Darla Robinson (“Defendants”) obtained a loan to buy real…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Carlton J. DittoTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. KoeppelDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Paterra v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Paterra v. Hansen CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021