Legal Opinion
Lester v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 20, 2013No. C 12-05491 LBPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mark Lester instituted this action against defendants J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Washington Mutual Bank (‘WaMu”) to, among other things, stop Chase from foreclosing on his home. See generally Complaint, ECF No. I.1 Chase now moves to dismiss Mr. Lester’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Motion, *1085ECF No. 8.2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b), the court finds this matter suitable…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michael Williams v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Kasey Hoffmann v. L. PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Glaski v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.