Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. James

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 9, 1995No. 21PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This opinion addresses a suspended attorney’s non-compliance with the order of suspension. In Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. James, 333 Md. 174, 634 A.2d 48 (1993) (James II), we suspended Richard Allen James (James) for one year. This continuation of James II arises under Maryland Rule BV13.a.2. That rule in relevant part provides that

“[u]pon expiration of the period of suspension specified in the order, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals shall replace the name of the attorney upon the register of attorneys in that Court, and the attorney may practice law, only after (a) the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Public Service Commission v. Hahn Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Kennedy v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Lukas v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. In Re Application of RGSCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HallmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarneysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API