Legal Opinion

Lemos v. Farmin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1932No. Docket No. 7971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet the title to a certain tract of land alleged to be owned by them.

The complaint alleges that defendants claim some interest in said land, but that the same is without right. Defendants by their amended answer deny that they have no interest in said land and aver that they own an easement or right of way across it and that they and their grantors and predecessors have owned, used and occupied said easement and right of way continuously for the past seventy years. They allege that said easement consists of a wagon road leading from a public…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. EverettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wells v. DiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Patchett v. Pac. Coast Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wallace v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Tract Development Services, Inc. v. KeplerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Bonds v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Jones v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API