Legal Opinion

Patchett v. Pac. Coast Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1893No. 19240PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. Q The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This action was instituted in November, 1892, by John A. Patchett and his four children to have their title quieted to a tract of land in San Luis Obispo county. The defendant corporation by its answer alleged title in itself to a strip sixty feet wide across the said tract, and pleaded in bar of the action the statute of limitations. The court below gave judgment against the defendant, from which it has appealed on the judgment-roll.

The facts found are in substance as follows: The plaintiff, John A. Patchett, and one Amanda Patchett, were husband and wife, and on December 9, 1880,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Cunningham v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. County of Los Angeles v. BerkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wren v. DixonNevada Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API