Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bentonize, Inc. v. Green

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1988No. C5-88-1050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Bentonize, Inc. appeals from a dismissal of its action for breach of an exclusive licensing agreement. The suit was dismissed for noncompliance with Rule 4.03 of the Fourth Judicial District.

Bentonize served the summons and complaint in an exclusive licensing action on respondents Wesley Green and Bryan McGroarty in October 1981. Green and McGroarty filed a counterclaim for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Thomas Hansing, owner of the majority of Bentonize stock, personally filed the summons and complaint in the Fourth Judicial District Court on January 9,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Conley v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Howard v. FrondellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imperial Premium Finance, Inc. v. GK Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Riley on Behalf of Swanson v. HerbesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Hellerstedt v. MacGibbonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API