Legal Opinion

Hellerstedt v. MacGibbon

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1992No. C0-92-280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant alleges the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to accept a late certificate of readiness for trial and dismissing his case with prejudice.

FACTS

In August 1989 appellant William Edward Hellerstedt served respondent John E. MacGibbon with a summons and complaint alleging attorney malpractice by respondent between 1979 and 1984 relative to appellant’s April 1980 dissolution. Respondent’s services included obtaining, implementing, modifying and appealing the dissolution decree. The supreme court, however, dismissed appellant’s appeal for procedural reasons.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Sand v. School Service Employees Union, Local 284Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shannon Fogarty v. Ciao BellaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Susan Dianna Orr v. Rebecca Kay BrittenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API