Legal Opinion

Bowen v. W. O. Eaton & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1909No. 6,494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Clinton Circuit Court; Samuel B. Artman, Special Judge. Suit by Abner T. Bowen and others against W. O. Eaton &-Co. and others. Prom the decree entered, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

This is a suit on behalf of appellants on four promissory notes and proceedings in attachment against W. O. Eaton & Co., William O. Eaton and Sheldon S. Eaton, and in garnishment against the County of Carroll, as debtors of W. O. Eaton & Co., William O. Eaton and Sheldon S. Eaton. There was a special finding of facts and conclusions of law stated thereon.

It appears from the special finding of facts that William O. Eaton and Sheldon S.- Eaton, in 1903, 1904 and 1905, were doing business under the firm name of W. O. Eaton & Co., and under such firm name, in 1903, entered into a contract for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wolcott v. WigtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Leach v. RainsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. HindmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Seymour Improvement Co. v. Viking Sprinkler Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. KAPLAN v. Tilles, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Fletcher American National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API