Legal Opinion

Seymour Improvement Co. v. Viking Sprinkler Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1928No. 12,908PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

This is an action by appellee upon an alleged written contract between it and appellant to recover the contract price for the installation of an automatic fire-sprinkler system in a factory building owned by appellant and leased to Sam B. Wolf, Jr., and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. An answer of non est factum and a reply of estoppel closed the issues. A trial by the court resulted in a judgment for appellee on the contract for $3,049.96, there being no finding or decree on the issue relating to the alleged mechanic’s lien. The errors assigned relate to the overruling of appellant’s…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ingalls Iron Works Company v. IngallsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1959
  2. Schemmel v. Hill, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Rowe v. Gatke CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. GarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  5. Thomas v. REVIEW BD. OF INDIANA EMPLOYMENT SEC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API