Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1936No. 15,099Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Dissenting opinion of Kime, P. J., in which Wiecking, J., concurs.

With the statement that where there has been an adjudication and a final determination by a competent tribunal the matter is considered forever at rest, I have no quarrel, but the dissension arises as to what was adjudicated in the first divorce suit. In the first suit filed by the husband he alleged that his wife had abandoned him and that because she had abandoned him he was entitled to a decree of divorce. To this complaint the wife filed an answer of general denial.

To determine what the court adjudicated…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Tyler v. Judges of the Court of RegistrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Beveridge v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API