Legal Opinion
Kakkanatt v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 2008No. 103,305PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.
{1 Appellant Annamma K. Kakkanatt (Kakkanatt) seeks reversal of the trial court's order affirming an order of Appellee Oklahoma Employment Commission Board of Review by which the Board of Review denied Appellant's - unemployment - compensation claim on a determination that she was discharged due to misconduct related to her work. We hold the trial court and administrative agency erred as a matter of law in subjecting Appellant to a higher standard of care in evaluating misconduct based upon her occupation as a nurse.
BACKGROUND
T2 The facts relevant to this appeal are not in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- MacEy v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Review BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fox v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MARCHANT v. HEARTLAND PARTS AND SERVICES, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- BROYLES v. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- BROYLES v. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Evans v. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- MARCHANT v. HEARTLAND PARTS AND SERVICES, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015