Legal Opinion

Fox v. Oklahoma Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1989No. 63714PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

Two issues are presented by the appellant, Charles F. Fox (Fox): (1) Whether Hershel v. Univ. Hosp. Found., 610 P.2d 237, 241 (Okla.1980), should be given retrospective application; and (2) Whether the trial court erred in entering judgment concerning the liability of physicians and staff on the issue of gross negligence. We find that: (1) The cause against the State is governed by Burns v. Rader, 723 P.2d 266, 268 (Okla.1986). Bums determined that Herskel operates prospectively to causes accruing after its mandate; and (2) The trial court erred in entering summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Thiry v. Armstrong World IndustriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Nail v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API