Legal Opinion
State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1976No. 46094PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Todd, Justice.
Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company (Fry) was convicted in Hen-nepin County Municipal Court of five separate violations of Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 180.015, 1 prohibiting emissions which create a nuisance, and was fined a total of $1,000. On appeal to the Hennepin County District Court the convictions were affirmed. Fry contends that in a criminal nuisance prosecution the state must establish the defendant’s intent to commit the alleged nuisance and its failure to do all it reasonably could to avert the alleged nuisance, and that therefore the evidence does not justify the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Johnson v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Lynch v. ShielySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.