Legal Opinion

United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1916No. 1568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The goods her.e in question consist of madras muslin curtains and madras muslin curtain goods in the piece. They are cotton fabrics .woven in various designs and colors, but all of the same general character, consisting of a light, open, or transparent background with Jacquard figured designs covering part of the surface. Duty was as*478sessed on all the goods at the rate of 35 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “Jacquard figured upholstery goods,” under paragraph 258 of the tariff act of 1913. The curtains are claimed by the importers to be dutiable at the rate of 30 per cent ad valorem…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Mills & GibbCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Tausend v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. John B. Stetson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  5. United States v. ShokaiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API