Aetna Life Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTLER, J.
Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna) seeks mandate review as authorized by Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 437c of a referee’s decision granting partial summary adjudication in favor of the insured, Mary Ellen Hammer, on questions of coverage under a group health insurance policy. The superior court adopted the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law without a hearing and ordered the findings and conclusions deemed established as a matter of law. We have concluded the reference was not authorized by statute and therefore the writ must issue ordering the partial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
- United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. Perrone C.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Darlington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Murphy v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.