Legal Opinion

Schroder v. Aden Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1904No. S.F. No. 3140PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an action to determine the right to about seven acres of mining ground situated in Mariposa County. The defendant, on a trial before the court without a jury obtained a judgment, from which and from an order denying them a new trial the plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs claim the land as a part of the San Antonio mining claim. They endeavored to prove to the satisfaction of the court that the disputed ground was included within the lines of said mining claim as they were originally run and marked with monuments in the field. To this end they called a witness who testified that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McGrath v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. City of San Francisco v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Sears v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Denman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API