Juvland v. Wood Brothers Thresher Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
In an action to recover the purchase price of a corn picker, based upon breach of an implied warranty of fitness for the purpose, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff purchased the corn picker from defendant on October 15, 1938, paying the purchase price in full. He testified that before that time he had never operated or even seen at close range a mechanical corn picker, although it appears that he was familiar with farm machinery in general. His testimony is that he relied upon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Parker v. S. G. Shaghalian & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Nichols & Shepard Co. v. WiedemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Ames v. QuimbySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Stonebrink v. Highland Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Booth v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Dotson v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Riviera Imports, Inc. v. Anderson Used Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.