Legal Opinion

Booth v. Spindler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 1961No. 37,869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The appellant, Allan Booth, instituted this action against respondents, Herbert Spindler and Ventoura Corporation, to rescind a contract for the purchase of a house trailer, alleging a breach of implied warranty of fitness by reason of excessive condensation experienced in the use of the equipment. The defendant Spindler counterclaimed for the cost of the installation and cross-claimed against defendant Ventoura Corporation for indemnity. At the conclusion of the trial, special interrogatories and general verdicts were submitted to the jury, who in the first instance returned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Cronquist v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Meinke v. LewandowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Cambern v. Sioux Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Ramfjord v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Charmoll Fashions, Inc. v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API