Legal Opinion

Stonebrink v. Highland Motors, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of a breach of implied warranty of merchant ability and fitness arising out of tbe sale by tbe defendant Highland Motors, Inc., a corporation, to plaintiff of a new automobile bumper jack in connection with the purchase of a second-hand used automobile. A judgment of voluntary nonsuit was taken as to the defendant General Motors Sales Corporation, the manufacturer of the jack. The cause was submitted to the jury as to the defendant seller and a verdict returned against it in the sum of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Porter Construction Co. v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Demarais v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wells v. Oldsmobile Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Keenan v. Cherry WebbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Trust v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API