Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Wiedemann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Clay county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This action was brought to foreclose a chattel mortgage given by the defendant to the plaintiff upon a grain-threshing outfit, consisting of steam engine and separator with appliances and attachments, to secure the payment of three promissory notes given for a part of the purchase price of the machinery and amounting in the aggregate to $2,100.
The answer admitted the making of the notes and mortgage, and alleged that the defendant purchased the machinery from the plaintiff for the agreed price of $2,700, and in part payment she turned over to it a second-hand threshing outfit at the agreed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Austin v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Scofield v. WalrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Orenstein v. KahnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
- Leland v. Modern SamaritansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Baker v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. TerpeningMontana Supreme Court · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.