Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1935No. Civ. 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing two bonds issued under the Improvement Act of 1911 on two pieces of property in the city of Oceanside in San Diego County. The case comes before us on the judgment roll.

Appellants urge that the judgment must be reversed because the complaint does not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action against them. No demurrer was interposed to the complaint.

It is alleged that the Guaranty Building and Loan Association of Los Angeles is a corporation; that on December 23, 1930, respondent was appointed receiver of the corporation by the United…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Reiner v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Shaingold v. ShaingoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Silverstein v. SilversteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Akin v. Security Savings & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API