Legal Opinion

Shaingold v. Shaingold

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1923No. L. A. No. 6958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

This is an action by a wife for separate maintenance, based upon allegations of cruelty and nonsupport. The husband filed a cross-complaint for divorce upon the ground of cruelty. The court denied both maintenance and divorce. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and respondent files no brief and makes no appearance in this court. Appellant’s claim is that the court did not sufficiently find the facts as to his allegations of cruelty. The finding of the court was to the effect that it was not true that the matters complained of had caused the defendant grievous mental suffering or great…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Locke v. KlunkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. F.People v. MonierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Exterstein v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Silverstein v. SilversteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Forrest v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API