Wells, Fargo & Co. v. McCarthy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage. There were over one hundred defendants. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for nearly $200,000, and for the sale of the property. The pleadings are numerous and quite voluminous, covering about four hundred and fifty pages of the transcript. Certain of the defendants, hot including McCarthy, the maker of the note, moved for a new trial on a bill of exceptions. The motion was denied. They appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial, and also from the judgment.
By appellants two points are urged for reversal. One relates to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Kiley v. MecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.