Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peters-Hamlin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 2016No. Misc. Docket AG No. 30PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

This reciprocal discipline action arises from a disciplinary proceeding initiated in the State of New York against Respondent, Kristan Peters-Hamlin, who while serving as lead counsel for a plaintiff in a trade secrets infringement suit, instructed a first-year associate to “mark-up” deposition transcripts and claim them as attorney work product; knowingly made false statements to the court to conceal same; and made copies and ordered additional copies of deposition transcripts for use in another matter, in contravention of court confidentiality orders.

On August 5, 2015, Petitioner, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Attorney Grievance v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API