Legal Opinion
Newhall Land & Farming Co. v. Hogue-Kellogg Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1922No. Civ. No. 4162PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $9,171.18, awarded to it as assignee of Steve Costamagna and B. Aragno for damages for the breach of a warranty as to type or variety of two lots of lima bean seed, aggregating 5,600 pounds, purchased by said Aragno and Costamagna from the defendant and planted upon their lands.
The facts of the case pertinent to the questions to be considered are summed up in the respondent’s brief and are substantially as follows: Early in April, 1919, Arthur S. Chesebrough, plaintiff’s ranch manager at the New'hall…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Passinger v. . ThorburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Klein v. Asgrow Seed Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hayman v. ShoemakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lane v. C. A. Swanson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Brandenstein v. JacklingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.