In Re Maldonado
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
A writ of habeas corpus, issued by the supreme court, was returned in this court. The return of the sheriff of the county of Santa Clara shows that the prisoner, upon a plea of guilty of possession of intoxicating liquor, was sentenced by the city judge of the city of Sunnyvale to pay a fine of five hundred dollars or to be imprisoned for one day for each dollar of fine so imposed and not paid.
The judgment and sentence which might result in five hundred days’ imprisonment in case the five hundred dollar fine remains unpaid is not in excess of the jurisdiction of the city court. The judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. NapthalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re MingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- In Re BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- In Re StambaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- In Re WeintraubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.