Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1974No. L.A. 29985PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this class action on behalf of themselves and other disadvantaged unemployed persons, alleging that defendants failed to perform contracts with the United States government under which defendants agreed to provide job training and at least one year of employment to certain numbers of such persons. Plaintiffs claim that they and the other such persons are third party beneficiaries of the contracts and as such are entitled to damages for defendants’ nonperformance. General demurrers to the complaint were sustained without leave to amend, apparently on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Joseph Britton v. Co-Op Banking Group, Jeff LieblingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API