Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Mosser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRedding, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the circuit court for Marion county, sustaining the motion of the State of Oregon and the defendants to quash service of summons on the defendants. Defendants’ motion to quash is based on the ground that the plaintiffs’ suit is one against the State of Oregon and is thus barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is conceded that a state is not suable without its consent and that consent has not here been given.

Plaintiffs, two citizens and taxpayers of the state of Oregon, brought this suit against the Director of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gearin v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Jarrett v. WillsOregon Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Akau v. Olohana Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Gruber v. Lincoln Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API