Legal Opinion

Payne v. American-Strevell, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1983No. A8002-01063; CA A23599PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

In this action for plaintiffs reinstatement to his former employment, pursuant to ORS 659.121, we affirmed the trial court’s judgment for defendants without opinion, 64 Or App 339, 668 P2d 491 (1983), and awarded costs to defendant American-Strevell, Inc., as the prevailing party. It now has filed a cost bill and a petition for attorney fees. Plaintiff has filed objections to both. We deny both.

ORS chapter 659 deals generally with enforcement of civil rights and is patterned after Title VII of the federal 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 USC § 2000e-5(k):

“In any action or proceeding under this title…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ballinger v. Klamath Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API