Commonwealth v. Hill
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
I
In this appeal,- we consider whether a criminal defendant who was indicted for non-capital offenses was entitled to ask members of the jury panel during voir dire about the range of punishment that could be imposed upon him in the event he was found guilty.
II
Ernest Oliver Hill, Jr., was indicted by a grand jury of the City of Richmond for rape in violation of Code § 18.2-61, forcible sodomy in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1, statutory burglary in violation of Code § 18.2-91, and robbery in violation of Code § 18.2-58. During the voir dire of the jury panel, the following colloquy occurred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Virginia v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Juniper v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Thomas v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- George Wesley Huguely, V v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Lilly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.