Legal Opinion
Virginia v. Hicks
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 16, 2003No. 02-371PublishedCited by 601 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
The issue presented in this case is whether the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority’s trespass policy is facially invalid under the First Amendment’s overbreadth doctrine.
H-l
The Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) owns and operates a housing development for low-income residents called Whitcomb Court. Until June 23, 1997, the city of Richmond owned the streets within Whit-comb Court. The city council decided, however, to “privatize” these streets in an effort to combat rampant crime and drug dealing in Whitcomb Court — much of it committed and conducted by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by601 opinions
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
596 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.