Lilly v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.
Convicted of driving after being declared an habitual offender, Elsie Lorraine Lilly contends that a partial repeal of the habitual offender statute in 1999 rendered continuing enforcement of the unrepealed portion unconstitutional. She also contends the trial court improperly precluded her counsel from informing the jury, prior to sentencing, about the mandatory minimum punishment she would face as a declared habitual offender and the legislative abolition of further civil declarations of habitual offender status. Finding her conviction suffered from neither error, we…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Flanagan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. Rayshawn Torrell GreerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Roadcap v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Doe v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.