Hovis v. Cudahy Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge. .
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
This is a suit for damages on account of a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff on October 7, 1912, while employed by the defendant in its plant at Coffeyville, Kan. The plaintiff secured judgment for $2999. The defendant appeals.
The petition alleges three grounds of negligence; first, in furnishing a diamond-point chisel which was not in a reasonably safe condition; second, in failing to furnish competent fellow workmen; third, in not warning plaintiff of the dangers incident to the work in which he was engaged.
The evidence tends to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Mather v. RillstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Mudd v. Neosho Memorial Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Taylor v. HostetlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Tarin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.