Legal Opinion

Harris v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1899No. 18,602PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Action by appellant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him on account of the alleged negligence of appellee in striking him with its train of cars while he was attempting to cross its railroad tracks in the city of Indianapolis.

There was an answer in denial and, on the issues joined, there was a trial before a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence introduced in the case, the defendant filed a motion requesting the court to direct- the jury to return a verdict in its favor for the reason that there was no evidence which, under the law, would entitle plaintiff to recover.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rozell v. City of AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bain v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. John's Episcopal Church of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Rosenberg v. RosenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Dillman v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API