Legal Opinion

Rozell v. City of Anderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1883No. 10,579PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

— Melvina T. Rozell, the plaintiff below, averred in her complaint in this action, that she was the owner of a certain lot in the city of Anderson, and occupied and had located on such lot a tan-housc, tan and other vats, tan-bark mill, steam engine and boiler, and all the fixtures and machinery necessary for carrying on a tan-yard and manufacturing leather; and she sought to recover of the appellee, the city of Anderson, the alleged damages to her property, *592occasioned by an overflow of water upon such property by reason of the unskilful and negligent construction by the city of certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Evansville v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Drinkout v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Roll v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Kinney v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lynch v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API