Rosenberg v. Rosenberg

Action by appellant against appellee for divorce on ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Appellee answered the complaint under the rules and filed what is designated as “Amended Cross-Complaint,” which was answered by appellant under the rules. The Complaint prayed for equitable relief without any express prayer for alimony. The “Cross-complaint,” in addition to specific allegations of cruel treatment of appellee by appellant, alleged, in substance, that appel lee had turned over to appellant his earnings from his employment by the Gary Bedding Company, except $2.00 per week, for safe…