Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. Keller

Appellants’ brief reveals that appellants brought a replevin action against the appellees, by complaint in form usual in such actions, to which appellees addressed an answer denying the averments of the *533complaint. The cause was originally submitted to a jury. At the close of appellants’ evidence in chief, appellants state, appellees moved the court for a directed verdict in their favor and, appellees say, appellants joined in said motion. The appellants say in their brief that the court sustained said motion and rendered judgment for appellees upon the verdict returned by the jury pursuant to…