Legal Opinion

Dailey v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1959No. 34395PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are again concerned with what statute governs a policeman’s retirement rights.

Clyde V. Dailey was appointed to the Seattle police department January 1, 1929. When he retired on August 3, 1955, at age fifty-three, he was a supervising captain, a position he had held for more than eight years; his salary for more than a year preceding his. retirement had been $520 a month.

The board of trustees of the relief and pension fund of the Seattle police department took the position that the applicable act, governing his retirement, was Laws of 1955, chapter 69, p. 417.

Section 3 of that act [cf. RCW…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eisenbacher v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Letterman v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Leonard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wash. Fed'n of State Employees Council 28 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Weaver v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bowen v. Statewide City Employees Retirement SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Eagan v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API