Legal Opinion

Eisenbacher v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1958No. 34239PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action against the city of Tacoma and the Firemen’s Pension Board of that city to compel the payment of certain pension benefits allegedly due plaintiffs under the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Act in force prior to 1935, and for judgment for pension benefits allegedly accrued thereunder. Plaintiffs in this action are retired Tacoma firemen or the surviving widows of Tacoma firemen. Defendants’ demurrers to the complaints were overruled. When defendants elected to stand on their demurrers, the trial court entered judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendants have appealed.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bayrón Toro v. SerraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Leonard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. INTER. ASS'N OF FIRE. v. Spokane AirportsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1789 v. Spokane AirportsWashington Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API