Wash. Fed'n of State Employees Council 28 v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
The sole question herein is whether Substitute Senate Bill 5007, 47th Legislature (1982) (SSB 5007) adopted in Laws of 1982, 1st Ex. Sess., ch. 51 violates arti*679ele 1, section 23 of the Washington Constitution.1 We hold SSB 5007 adversely affects the existing pension rights of those State employees who began service prior to October 1, 1977, and thus is unconstitutional.
Prior to 1952, State employees were entitled to 14 days of vacation time per year under RCW 43.01.040. If an employee failed to take the allotted time prior to termination, it was lost. In 1952, many municipal and county…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Ruano v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. SlavinWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.